This page has moved to a new address.

Running the Football with the Power Play (Power-O, Counter, Counter-GT)

Strong Football by Coach CP: Running the Football with the Power Play (Power-O, Counter, Counter-GT)

This page has moved to a new address.

Running the Football with the Power Play (Power-O, Counter, Counter-GT)

Strong Football by Coach CP: Running the Football with the Power Play (Power-O, Counter, Counter-GT)

Monday, October 10, 2011

Running the Football with the Power Play (Power-O, Counter, Counter-GT)

I believe running the power play or scheme, otherwise known as power-o or even "Dave" by Jim Tressel's offense of Ohio State, is the most successful football play I've ever run. The reason being is the blocking scheme is simple and it is easy to recycle the power play's blocking scheme for other plays like Counter.

Blocking Scheme for Power-O

Power's blocking scheme is relatively simple, regardless of if you run it out of shotgun or pistol spread, under center, or anything else your creative offensive mind can come up with.

Playside Offensive Linemen

The most basic way to teach the scheme is to tell all the playside linemen, they are responsible for their inside gap. If there is any threat to their inside gap, they need to execute a down block. Down blocking has your linemen work on a 45 degree angle, getting their head infront of the defensive linemen, and running the feet. If there is no threat to their inside gap, then they should look playside in-order to execute combination or "combo" block with their playside teammate. If no threat exits or if a playside combination block is not possible (no playside teammate), the player needs to work to a backside linebacker.

So that sounds like a lot. Once you install the play and run through it, I use the following coach speak, "Inside Gap to Playside Combo". This has been very successful for us. With these rules, you can easily pickup inside linebacker blitzes. Note, the tight end should know the playside combo never exists for him.

Backside Blocking

The backside guard needs to pull playside. His goal is to wrap on the playside linebacker, but often, if that linebacker is good, he will end up meeting him at or near the line of scrimage. The guard also needs to block any unblocked man (when under center) that exists at the line of scrimmage.

The technique of the pulling guard is widely varied. Some teams will have him take a drop step with his playside foot and then step through with his backside foot. This looks like "karaoke", the famous warm up drill. This offers your guard the opportunity to get his shoulders parallel right away, and the ability to get up field right away. The problem is his leverage (it's very hard to stay low and execute the karaoke step at full speed), power (he won't have the ability to drive a linebacker back until he takes 2-3 steps after his karaoke step), and finally balance (if the center get's blown up, there is no way you'll get around. Also, it's hard for the guard to successfully around the fullback if your fullback is forced to log the defensive end for some reason.

The other technique for the pulling guard, and the one I prefer, is the short pull with a wrap. The guard picks his playside foot up, with his big toe aiming at the playside B gap. This should give him a good upfield angle. He then executes the pull looking to wrap at his first opportunity (usually around the pre-snap B gap). This may prevent your guard from getting his shoulder square and may take him more time to get up field, however he is better able to handle all the other variables that are presented to him.

The backside tackle needs to step and hinge. He does this for 2 reasons. If there is no backside A gap threat, he needs to push the B gap threat to the center and then he needs to hinge backside and pickup the defensive end. If there is an A and B gap threat, he needs to lock onto the B gap threat. If there is no one in the B gap, he still needs to step and hinge, so he can prevent linebacker run through.

Finally, some teams will wrap or pull the fullback on the playside linebacker rather than the guard. This is commonly considered "Counter" or "Counter GT" rather than "Power" or "Power-O". Pulling the fullback from an off-set I alignment provides a better angle on the playside linebacker for the most part. The fullback can run downhill while not having to worry about penetration by the center or playside guard blocking back. The caveat is the fullback needs to read kickout block by the guard. If the guard logs the end, the fullback needs to continue around the guard and wrap the playside linebacker. This is easier said then done, because often teams that spill guards have engrained a linebacker mentality called "scrape exchange", where the defensive end and linebacker exchange gaps. The fullback also needs to be ready to immediately take on a blocker once passing the center, looking for run through.

Kickout on the EMOLOS

The fullback or backside guard needs to isolate the inside position on the end man on the line of scrimage (EMOLOS) and drive him out of the hole as he pulls down the line of scriamge. The EMOLOS is typically the playside defensive end. This block is very important, as is the technique. The fullback or backside guard MUST work inside out on the defensive end and run down hill. At the same time, the blocker needs to maintain a good forward lean and knee bend in order to roll the hips into the block. This is difficult to balance and execute, especially against "violent" defensive ends. If the defensive end works inside and wrong arms or spills the fullback or bubbles him back, the fullback will be forced to execute a log blog and our backside guard must work around his block, and the tailback must bounce it. This will typically leave the safety one on one with our back with a great angle to make the play. This is why understanding safety leverage, coverage technique, and aggressiveness is vastly important on the power or counter scheme. If you know going into the game that you will have problems going outside, you can adapt your play calling, call "power base" (described below), or really focus on getting your kickout blockers to dig out defensive ends. You can help the end by motioning him closer to the point of attack. This can cause tendencies and give away the snap count, so use it wisely with other plays as well.

Read the EMOLOS

Some teams, instead, will choose to read the playside EMOLOS on Power out of the gun. They will offset the runningback away from the play or to the playside. If the back is offset away, he will come across the fullback on a stretch path. Instead of kicking out the end, the QB will read the end. If the end can tackle the QB, he gives to the back.

On the other hand, the back and line up to the call side, but he probably needs to be at least 1 yard to a yard and a half behind the QB. This will make the runningback the dive person. The QB reads the playside end, and if the end can tackle the runningback, the QB keeps the ball off the edge. This is different from the counter from the gun, where the back takes the hand off going to the backside, stops, and then comes back to the playside. This is a playside, down hill run for the tailback, more of the traditional "power o" mentality and footwork.

Both variations are great alternatives if you want to install a few spread sets but minimize new blocking schemes, or if you come into the year without a fullback or tight end type to execute good kickout. It's also good versus teams that spill, because the defensive EMOLOS will always be wrong. Overall, I feel this version is best used against a wider front or an over front. A tandem from the under defense cause problems (see below for more information on tandems below).

Power "Base"

Power base is a wonderful adjustment to the kickout version. Some teams, like the Wisconsin Badgers, strictly run power base against a 9 technique EMOLOS. Versus a team that provides a traditional over front with a 3 technique on the outside shade of the guard and a 9 technique on the outside of the tight end to the strength, the fullback can lead up either on the Mike or the Sam. Usually, I prefer the Sam just because the fullback should almost never be taught to run past anyone in an I formation offense, in my opinion. The backside guard would then wrap for either the Mike linebacker in a 00 or a 10 technique in the strongside A gap, or the Sam playing over the strongside C Gap.

This adjustment can be limiting though, since Under fronts can give you a tandem on the edge. A tandem, in this case, is when there are two defensive players covering the last two offensive EMOLOS players. Against an underfront, the fullback would lead up on the 30 technique strongside linebacker, or the B gap playside linebacker. The tackle and tight end would go "out" "out" on the tandem players, the strongside 5 technique defensive end and the Sam Linebacker, aligned in a 9 technique. The backside guard would pull into the first openning he sees and lead up on the first threat (often in this scenario, its actually the backside linebacker). Often times, Wisconsin will be in a two tight end set or even 22 personnel, with 2 tight ends in a fullback. This allows them find the 9 technique without a tandem and base him.

This variation can be run from pro style 3 receiver, 1 tight end sets as well (11 personnel). This allows the power blocking scheme to be adaptable overall.

Weakside Power

It should be noted that weakside power (specifically to a split end side) is essentially the same as strongside power. All of the rules stay in tact. Playside linemen look (1) inside gap to (2) playside combo, before working to (3) a linebacker. The weakside tackle, who is now also the playside tackle, can eliminate step 2 and go straight to a linebacker. However, for younger kids, and Russ Grimm (power-o expert of Redskins, Cardinals, and Steelers), you may want to call the play something else since the read is different for the playside tackle and the wrap from the backside puller may happen quicker.

Red vs. White Side

There are some coaches who believe in the "Red" and "White" theory of playcalling, especially for counter and power. For those unfamiliar, the advocates of this system believe plays are run best to either a reduction (red) or a wide side (white). The reason for this is the technique and run reads will always stay constant. A reduced front means that there is a defensive linemen in the B gap (usually a 3 technique on the guard). On any down, there can be both a red and a white side, a double red call, and a double white call. (Yes, I summed this up quickly so I didn't take an hour explaining all the scenarios). An example, an under front, with the 5 technique to the strongside, has white call to the strength, and a red call to the weakside (3 technique). Versus an over front, a red call would be made to the strongside because of the existance of a B gap defensive linemen (the 3 technique), and a white call to the backside (no B gap defensive lineman). A double red call could therefore occur in a Bear front (with two 3 techniques), so no white call would exist.

The theory of playcalling, for the most part, is simple. You call power to the red side because it is supposed to be a quick hitting play that goes down hill. The 3 technique, the person causing the "red call", should be driven down inside with the combo block between the guard and tackle, and the tailback should be able to run the true "A gap" power then, where the back has an A gap mentality and footwork. Counter or Counter GT, on the other hand, should be run to the white side, because it will take a longer time for the double team between the tackle and tight end to move the 5 technique or C gap defending end down the LOS, and the back is typically making some kind of counter move with an aiming point in the B or C gap.

There are holes in the theory. For the most part, while this strives to minimize technique on certain plays (ie Always a a "deuce" or guard/tackle combo on power), a team can still provide different techniques. A combo block on a 4i is much different from a combo block on a 3 technique, at least in my opinion. It also limits you. I believe I can still have an A gap mentality on Power or Counter to a "white" side, especially if my tight end is a man. Overall though, the logic is there for this system, however, it involves great in-game scounting, careful gameplanning, or a very smart offense to make the switch at the LOS, so this is a college or pro-style theory of calling power/counter (and a lot of other plays for that manner).

Running the Power O

Overall, yes you can make the scheme as complicated or simple as you'd like. However, at it's core, the base power or counter scheme is simple and worthwhile for most offenses. You can run it and read the playside end out of a spread look. You can run it from the I or from the single wing or wing T. It can be adjusted easily and simply to be executed versus a wide variety of defenses and techniques.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

5 Comments:

At December 17, 2011 at 1:51 PM , Blogger Human Cone said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At December 17, 2011 at 1:54 PM , Blogger Human Cone said...

Good stuff. I think it helps to run an IZR play with angle blocking by the linemen. That way, to the D-End it looks just like a down block for power or counter. Even better if the back runs a bender path back towards the QB.

Also, running the same blocking scheme but doing a playside zone read slide action by the QB is really nice because it loosens up both the end and the backer; thus makes it even easier to come back later and run a nice tight power path.

 
At December 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM , Blogger Human Cone said...

One of our opponents ran a nice counter scheme out of 10 personnel. When we had a 5-tech and a 1-shade to the playside, they had their OG block down on the shade and their OT base the 5-tech. To the LB, this is a clear read to him, so he fills the B-gap. When he did, their OT turned his 5 loose and wheeled back violently on the filling LB. Then, the pulling guard easily kicked out the 5-tech. Ball hit the outside half of the B gap real nice.

 
At December 21, 2011 at 8:05 AM , Blogger Coach CP said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

 
At December 21, 2011 at 8:19 AM , Blogger Coach CP said...

One of our coaches was discussing a play like that last night. Said they saw it in the 49ers steelers game. I believe he said it was 21 personnel in their situation. We have used Power Base, which this concept would be very similar to (obviously its counter), but we don't have the additional rule on power base of first inside gap threat, like we do our other power schemes(that rule is inside gap, playside combo, backside backer, as I mentioned). On counter, we don't typically base it. It makes sense to include it though with this rule, because it fits with our other power scheme concepts. I like it coach! Thanks!

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home